Epstein Secrets

onsive records. Thank you. Submitted Description: This request concerns the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein brought by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in July of 2019. I am interested in records or communications between SDNY and a bank, referred to as "Institution-1" in a court filing

the sake of 1. Following are links to press releases that are or may be responsive to your 2. Other publicly-available information is available on PACER under docket no. 19 Cr. 0490 (S.D.N.Y.) 3. We draw your attention to the FBI's FOIA vault, https://vaultibi.gov/. Records that the FBI previously

Paul G. Cassell, Esq. October 23, 2010 U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida 99 N.E. 46' Street Miami, FL 33131Via Re: Protecting the Rights of Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Dear Dexter: First, as mentioned befo

l) to set up a scheduling conference with your Office to bring the case to an expeditious conclusion. That notice was served on your Office via the PACER electronic filing system. Yet, in spite of that offer to set up a scheduling conference made more than a month ago, your Office said nothing to the

ashing subpoenas ad testificanduni and duces twain served on than by plaintiff Jane Doe in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida captioned Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893-1CAM, or in the alternative for a Protective Order pursuant to Fed. R Civ. Proc. 26(cX

Doe's brief in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment dismissing the federal claims in this action ("Si °pp.') may be found on PACER, S.D. Ma. Civil Docket for Jane Doe v. Jeffro Epstein, Case # 9:08-cv-80893-KAM ("Dockerp, ppeP4 EFTA00207294 expressions of confidence in the s

Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida Re: Protecting the Rights of Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Dear First, as mentioned before, please feel free to call me "Paul" rather th

l) to set up a scheduling conference with your Office to bring the case to an expeditious conclusion. That notice was served on your Office via the PACER electronic filing system. Yet, in spite of that offer to set up a scheduling conference made more than a month ago, your Office said nothing to the

n I advised you that it was likely that the above titled action would be ordered to be consolidated with the MDL Bear Stearns Litigation pending in the Southern District of New York, and that FTC should immediately retain stateside counsel to represent FTC in the MDL proceedings. On January 7, 2010, the case of Fina

nction with the Administrative Office ofthe United States Courts, develops a case management/electronic case Sling (CM/ECF) system that will include PACER access to Panel docket sheets and other information. The Executive Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States has agreed to waive te

ashing subpoenas ad testificanduni and duces twain served on than by plaintiff Jane Doe in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida captioned Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893-1CAM, or in the alternative for a Protective Order pursuant to Fed. R Civ. Proc. 26(cX

Doe's brief in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment dismissing the federal claims in this action ("Si °pp.') may be found on PACER, S.D. Ma. Civil Docket for Jane Doe v. Jeffro Epstein, Case # 9:08-cv-80893-KAM ("Dockerp, ppeP4 EFTA00612027 expressions of confidence in the s