5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h
t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t
ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h
t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t
ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h
t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t
ing BOP records. The charges were later dismissed after they successfully fulfilled deferred prosecution agreements. The U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York declined prosecution for other MCC New York employees who the OIG found created false documentation. The combination of these and othe
not observe on the recorded video any CO or other individual enter any of the SHU tiers, which is consistent with CO Tova Noel and Material Handler Michael Thomas's admissions to the OIG that the SHU rounds and counts were not conducted during that time frame. At approximately 6:28 a.m., an unidentified officer
ing BOP records. The charges were later dismissed after they successfully fulfilled deferred prosecution agreements. The U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York declined prosecution for other MCC New York employees who the OIG found created false documentation. The combination of these and othe
not observe on the recorded video any CO or other individual enter any of the SHU tiers, which is consistent with CO Tova Noel and Material Handler Michael Thomas's admissions to the OIG that the SHU rounds and counts were not conducted during that time frame. At approximately 6:28 a.m., an unidentified officer
Entities connected to both the Southern District and Michael Thomas's

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
New York
LOCATION
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSONCity of New York
LOCATION
Audrey Strauss
PERSONFederal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATION
Metropolitan Correctional Center
ORGANIZATION
South
LOCATIONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATIONGarcia
PERSONthe New York Police Department
ORGANIZATIONSpecial Housing Unit
ORGANIZATION
Mark Epstein
PERSON
the United States Government
ORGANIZATION
The New York Times
ORGANIZATION