Epstein Secrets

etter of August 21, 2020. 16. We request copies of the "82-page pros memo and 53-page indictment" drafted as part of the investigation conducted by the Southern District of Florida. See SDNY GM 00131226. 17. We request all e-mails, text messages, letters, or other written communications to or from Ms. Maxwell. 18.

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

etter of August 21, 2020. 16. We request copies of the "82-page pros memo and 53-page indictment" drafted as part of the investigation conducted by the Southern District of Florida. See SDNY GM 00131226. 17. We request all e-mails, text messages, letters, or other written communications to or from Ms. Maxwell. 18.

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

etter of August 21, 2020. 16. We request copies of the "82-page pros memo and 53-page indictment" drafted as part of the investigation conducted by the Southern District of Florida. See SDNY GM 00131226. 17. We request all e-mails, text messages, letters, or other written communications to or from Ms. Maxwell. 18.

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

etter of August 21, 2020. 16. We request copies of the "82-page pros memo and 53-page indictment" drafted as part of the investigation conducted by the Southern District of Florida. See SDNY GM 00131226. 17. We request all e-mails, text messages, letters, or other written communications to or from Ms. Maxwell. 18.

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

etter of August 21, 2020. 16. We request copies of the "82-page pros memo and 53-page indictment" drafted as part of the investigation conducted by the Southern District of Florida. See SDNY GM 00131226. 17. We request all e-mails, text messages, letters, or other written communications to or from Ms. Maxwell. 18.

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

etter of August 21, 2020. 16. We request copies of the "82-page pros memo and 53-page indictment" drafted as part of the investigation conducted by the Southern District of Florida. See SDNY GM 00131226. 17. We request all e-mails, text messages, letters, or other written communications to or from Ms. Maxwell. 18.

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

rted "upon information and belie?' that they understood that Epstein was involved in on-going plea negotiations with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. Victims' Petition (doe. #1) at 1. On July 9, 2008, the Government responded with a sealed response (quickly unsealed by the Court), that

may be favorable to the defendant on the issues of guilty or punishment within the scope of Brady'. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and United States. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976)." See, eg., Standing Discovery Order, United States. Enriquex, No. 1:10-CR-20488- MGC (July 9, 2010) (doc. #115). These Standing