Epstein Secrets

I'm here with my colleague, David McCraw. THE COURT: Very good. Good afternoon to both of you. Who do I have for the government on behalf of the Federal Bureau of Prisons? MR. afternoon. : Steven , your Honor. Good THE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. And, Mr. Walker, our court reporter, are you on the line? (Pause

let me start us off on Tartaglione because I may be able to zero in on what is of particular concern. I could not follow, although I've read both Capone declarations, including the first one — which, starting around paragraph 28, engages with Tartaglione — I couldn't think up, except with some degr

uld not implicate the entire document, right? MR. : With the exception that I think some of these documents — and I believe this is noted in the Capone declaration — there are concerns about even releasing them in part because I think the idea, first, in the Tartaglione case that there would be do

I'm here with my colleague, David McCraw. THE COURT: Very good. Good afternoon to both of you. Who do I have for the government on behalf of the Federal Bureau of Prisons? MR. KOCHEVAR: Steven Kochevar, your Honor. Good afternoon. THE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. Kochevar. And, Mr. Walker, our court reporter, are y

let me start us off on Tartaglione because I may be able to zero in on what is of particular concern. I could not follow, although I've read both Capone declarations, including the first one — which, starting around paragraph 28, engages with Tartaglione — I couldn't think up, except with some degr

implicate the entire document, right? MR. KOCHEVAR: With the exception that I think some of these documents — and I believe this is noted in the Capone declaration — there are concerns about even releasing them in part because I think the idea, first, in the Tartaglione case that there would be do

Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK • THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, -v- FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. X 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN

isclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The Capone and Supplemental Capone Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tartaglione prosecution, wherein the G

Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK • THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, -v- FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. X 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN

isclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The Capone and Supplemental Capone Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tartaglione prosecution, wherein the G