Epstein Secrets

BOP also properly withheld records under Exemption 7(A) that could reasonably be expected to interfere with the prosecutions of Michael Thomas and Tova Noel. The Capone Declarations logically and plausibly explain why these records could reasonably be expected to interfere with Noel, including because t

dure' is `a particular way of doing or going about the accomplishment of something.'" ACLU v. DHS, 243 F. Supp. 3d 393, 402 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (quoting Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 682 (2d Cir. 2010)); see NYCLU v. DHS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289, 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I.

on of the law." Exemption 7(E) contains "two alternative clauses," one covering "techniques and procedures," and the other addressing "guidelines." Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep 't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 680-81 (2d Cir. 2010). The first clause of Exemption 7(E) provides categorical

of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I.

on of the law." Exemption 7(E) contains "two alternative clauses," one covering "techniques and procedures," and the other addressing "guidelines." Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep 't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 680-81 (2d Cir. 2010). The first clause of Exemption 7(E) provides categorical

BOP also properly withheld records under Exemption 7(A) that could reasonably be expected to interfere with the prosecutions of Michael Thomas and Tova Noel. The Capone Declarations logically and plausibly explain why these records could reasonably be expected to interfere with Noel, including because t

dure' is `a particular way of doing or going about the accomplishment of something.'" ACLU v. DHS, 243 F. Supp. 3d 393, 402 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (quoting Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 682 (2d Cir. 2010)); see NYCLU v. DHS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289, 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I.

on of the law." Exemption 7(E) contains "two alternative clauses," one covering "techniques and procedures," and the other addressing "guidelines." Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep 't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 680-81 (2d Cir. 2010). The first clause of Exemption 7(E) provides categorical

BOP also properly withheld records under Exemption 7(A) that could reasonably be expected to interfere with the prosecutions of Michael Thomas and Tova Noel. The Declarations logically and plausibly explain why these records could reasonably be expected to interfere with Noel, including because they "in

edure' is `a particular way of doing or going about the accomplishment of something." ACLU v. DHS, 243 F. Supp. 3d 393, 402 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (quoting Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 682 (2d Cir. 2010)); see NYCLU v. DHS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289, 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)