Epstein Secrets

lete. Senior Officer Specialist 6 reviewed the MCC New York 10 p.m. institutional count, which showed that the SHU had 73 inmates assigned, whereas the Receiving and Discharge Department had zero inmates assigned to the unit. When questioned by the OIG about the 10 p.m. SHU count slip that listed “73 + 1” inmates and was signed by

propriate cellmate.” A review of the email recipients showed that the email was sent to, among others, the Warden, Associate Warden 2, the Captain, the SHU Lieutenant, the SIS Lieutenant, the Day Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Evening Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Morning Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Day

lete. Senior Officer Specialist 6 reviewed the MCC New York 10 p.m. institutional count, which showed that the SHU had 73 inmates assigned, whereas the Receiving and Discharge Department had zero inmates assigned to the unit. When questioned by the OIG about the 10 p.m. SHU count slip that listed '73 + 1" inmates and was signed by t

ppropriate cellmate." A review of the email recipients showed that the email was sent to, among others, the Warden, Associate Warden 2, the Captain, the SHU Lieutenant, the SIS Lieutenant, the Day Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Evening Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Morning Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Day

lete. Senior Officer Specialist 6 reviewed the MCC New York 10 p.m. institutional count, which showed that the SHU had 73 inmates assigned, whereas the Receiving and Discharge Department had zero inmates assigned to the unit. When questioned by the OIG about the 10 p.m. SHU count slip that listed '73 + 1" inmates and was signed by t

ppropriate cellmate." A review of the email recipients showed that the email was sent to, among others, the Warden, Associate Warden 2, the Captain, the SHU Lieutenant, the SIS Lieutenant, the Day Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Evening Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Morning Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Day

e. Senior Officer Specialist 6 reviewed the MCC New York 10:00 p.m. institutional count, which showed that the SHU had 73 inmates assigned, whereas the Receiving and Discharge Department had zero inmates assigned to the unit. When questioned by the OIG about the 10:00 p.m. SHU count slip that listed "73 + 1" inmates and was signed b

ppropriate cellmate." A review of the email recipients showed that the email was sent to, among others, the Warden, Associate Warden 2, the Captain, the SHU Lieutenant, the SIS Lieutenant, the Day Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Evening Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Morning Watch Operations Lieutenant, the Day