7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency's decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.
tion and Failure to Replace Him with Another Inmate 51 A. Notice on August 8 of the Impending Transfer of Epstein's Cellmate on August 9 51 B. MCC New York Staff Reject Epstein Attorney's Request that Epstein be Housed Without a Cellmate 51 C. Removal on August 9 of Epstein's Cellmate from MCC New York 5
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency's decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.
's decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.S.C. § 7701(c)(1)(B) and 5 C.F.R. § 1201.56(b)(1)(ii). A. MCC New York Staff Failed to Ensure that Epstein Had a Cellmate on August 9 as Instructed by the Psychology Department on July 30 On July 30, 2019, the MCC New York P
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency's decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.
in's Cellmate on August 9 45 Limited Official Use Only—Not for Public Release EFTA00172551 Limited Official Use Only—Not for Public Release B. MCC New York Staff Reject Epstein Attorney's Request that Epstein be Housed Without a Cellmate 46 C. Removal on August 9 of Epstein's Cellmate from MCC New York 46
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency’s decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U
................................. 51 A. Notice on August 8 of the Impending Transfer of Epstein’s Cellmate on August 9 .................... 51 B. MCC New York Staff Reject Epstein Attorney’s Request that Epstein be Housed Without a Cellmate ........................................................................
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency’s decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U
s decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.S.C. § 7701(c)(1)(B) and 5 C.F.R. § 1201.56(b)(1)(ii). A. MCC New York Staff Failed to Ensure that Epstein Had a Cellmate on August 9 as Instructed by the Psychology Department on July 30 On July 30, 2019, the MCC New York P
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency's decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.
tion and Failure to Replace Him with Another Inmate 51 A. Notice on August 8 of the Impending Transfer of Epstein's Cellmate on August 9 51 B. MCC New York Staff Reject Epstein Attorney's Request that Epstein be Housed Without a Cellmate 51 C. Removal on August 9 of Epstein's Cellmate from MCC New York 5
Unless otherwise noted, the OIG applies the preponderance of the evidence standard in determining whether DOJ personnel have committed misconduct. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board applies this same standard when reviewing a federal agency's decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.
's decision to take adverse action against an employee based on such misconduct. See 5 U.S.C. § 7701(c)(1)(B) and 5 C.F.R. § 1201.56(b)(1)(ii). A. MCC New York Staff Failed to Ensure that Epstein Had a Cellmate on August 9 as Instructed by the Psychology Department on July 30 On July 30, 2019, the MCC New York P
Entities connected to both The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board and MCC New York Staff

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Metropolitan Correctional Center
ORGANIZATIONNortheast Regional Office
ORGANIZATIONMCC New York General Housing Unit Post Orders
ORGANIZATIONthe Southern District
LOCATIONDigital Video Recorder
ORGANIZATIONFederal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATIONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONthe L Tier where Epstein
ORGANIZATIONthe Evening Watch Operations Lieutenant
ORGANIZATIONthe Day Watch Activities Lieutenant
ORGANIZATIONthe Day
ORGANIZATIONMCC New York Lieutenants
ORGANIZATION
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONCharge
ORGANIZATIONMCC New York SHU Post Orders
ORGANIZATIONMCC New York SHU Post
ORGANIZATIONTova Noel
PERSONMCC New York Psychology Department
ORGANIZATION