Epstein Secrets

v. U.S., 24 Cl.Ct at 515-16; see also Wilson v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 2006 WL 3791313, *1 (E.D. La. 2006)(granting mo

[email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger &

estigation will be closed is not immoderate or unreasonable. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. U.S„ 24 CI.Ct at 515-16; Ea to Wilson v, National Association of Letter Carriers, 2006 WL 3791313, *1 (E.D. La. 2006Xgranting motion to stay civil proceeding for 2 years and 7 months pending criminal investigation); Ostrow v, U.

rights and participate in civil discovery in order to defend this civil action. Accordingly, Epstein adopts his arguments set forth in the Reply to Jane Doe's Response In Opposition filed in 08-CIV-80893 (DE 54) and incorporates same herein by reference. EFTA00201284 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 81

gation will be closed is not immoderate or unreasonable. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. U.S., 24 CI.Ct at 515-16; see also Wilson v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 2006 WL 3791313, *1 (ED. La. 2006)(granting motion to stay civil proceeding for 2 years and 7 months pending criminal investigation). Here, Epstei

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 54 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 — MARRA/JOHNSON Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintiff's Response