d because a parallel criminal proceeding against Epstein does not exist. Not only is Plaintiff's theory incorrect for reasons set out herein and in the Epstein's Motion to Stay, but her response ignores the 2 EFTA00201285 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 05'13/2009 Page 3 of 7 Page 3 signifi

d because a parallel criminal proceeding against Epstein does not exist. Not only is Plaintiff's theory incorrect for reasons set out herein and in the Epstein's Motion to Stay, but her response ignores the significant fact that a stay may be issued in light of an ongoing investigation. It is clear from the NPA and Jack Go