Epstein Secrets

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has "repeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery" and that "[a] court may re

arm; [2] the precision with which the order is drawn; [3] the availability of a less onerous alternative; and [4] the duration of the order." In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). H. THERE IS GOOD CAUSE TO ISSUE THE PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Even though the Eleventh Circuit has rul

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has "repeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery" and that "[a] court may rest

arm; [2] the precision with which the order is drawn; [3] the availability of a less onerous alternative; and [4] the duration of the order." In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). H. THERE IS GOOD CAUSE TO ISSUE THE PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Even though the Eleventh Circuit has rul

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has Arepeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery@ and that A[a] court may re

harm; [2] the precision with which the order is drawn; [3] the availability of a less onerous alternative; and [4] the duration of the order.@ In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). II. THERE IS GOOD CAUSE TO ISSUE THE PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Even though the Eleventh Circuit has r