Epstein Secrets

1986). Thus, while the public may enjoy the right of access to "pleadings, docket entries, orders, affidavits or depositions duly.filed," Wilson v. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568, 569 (11 th Cir. 1985) ( emphasis added), common-law right of access does not extend to information collected through discovery whic

( emphasis added), common-law right of access does not extend to information collected through discovery which is not a matter of public record. See Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 33,104 S.Ct. 2199, 2207, 81 L.Ed.2d 17 (1984); Anderson, 799 F.2d at 1441; United States v. Gurney. 558 F.2d 1202, 1209

EQUEST FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER IS `GOOD CAUSE' Citing Brown v. Advantage Eng I, Inc., 960 F.2d 1013 (11th Cir. 1992), and Wilson v. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court has requested that we set forth "the extraordinary circumstances or particularized needs necessitating a

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has "repeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery" and that "[a] court may re

EQUEST FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER IS `GOOD CAUSE' Citing Brown I. Advantage Eng g, Inc., 960 F.2d 1013 (11th Cir. 1992), and Wilson I. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court has requested that we set forth "the extraordinary circumstances or particularized needs necessitating a

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has "repeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery" and that "[a] court may rest

REQUEST FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER IS >GOOD CAUSE= Citing Brown v. Advantage Eng=g, Inc, 960 F.2d 1013 (11th Cir. 1992), and Wilson v American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court has requested that we set forth Athe extraordinary circumstances or particularized needs necessitating a

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has Arepeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery@ and that A[a] court may re