Epstein Secrets

.. w/ cli~ni, ~e: hearing daie R\iJiewed:Pl's rvierrio oJ La\v opposing Aronberg's 57i10~ motion f6rfees.lsahctions ,RE!vie~1ed Pl's Respo11se ,to Aroriberg's r~qlle~t to sctie~tiie 57,,·105 ·motion for.tees after'MSJ' Review,ed Pl's Memo of Law opposing 57, i 0;i motion , , , - , , , , ••••.••·

a:nd jury rec·ords and the role of the State Attorney ,concerning such disdosure. Here, the results obtained were the maxinmin sought by Defendant Aroriberg ,as he was <;iismis~ed from the case; albeit not within th9 tinw CQ_nstraiI1ts o_(ihc ~a(c.:ha,r:bor provi_sion within § 57. i65, Fla,. Stat. Ther

in costs relating to the proceeding on Defendant Aronberg’s Ariiended Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. Thus, the CA/AropfpgjO^ BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 4:20:48 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Plaintiffs October 21, 2020 ,Notice of propping St_ate Attorney, Da:ve Aronbe~g-from the abo\,~- .

!_s rel~ting to the proceeding on Defendant Arcinberg's Amended Motion for Attotneyf Fees and Costs. Thus, the CA/Aro~fi:m5?i~5c~ BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 4:20:48 PM total amount of costs sought to be reimbursed herein total $2,282.77. See, Exhibit “D” attached hereto. 9. The attorn

.· . ·. . • -The total time Affiant's law finn has expended services reridered _to date is 74.8 -ho~rs, however, -fr()m !he __ date of Defendant Aroriberg' s 5 7. I 05 demand; Affiant' s law firm -has • • • . . ·• . • • •.. ·. . expen~ed a. total of 42.2 hours. Of the42.2 hours expended sin~e Defe

ts. " See, Siboni v. Allen, 52 So. 3d 779, 781 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); Rule l.420(a)(l) Fla. R. Civ. P. 5 CA/AroJltlffl'.!IJ)PD03.N BEACH COUNTY; FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 4:10:49 PM TL Consequently, the filing of Plaintiffs Notice triggered Rule 1.525, Fla. R. Civ. P. and therefore: I Under [§ 57.1

er of its First Amended Complaint within 21 days ofservice of the 57.105 Demand and Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. 2 CA/AroBIMEg9OO0aM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 4:10:49 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY 2. On December 6, 2019, the State Attorney filed his Motion to Dismiss, then on December 13, 2019

ur Honor, is 5 that 905.27 requires a court order before the records 6 are unsealed. 7 THE COURT: Exactly. Exactly. 8 All right. Let me hear from Mr. Aroriberg's 9 attorney, Mr. Wyler. 10 MR. WYLER: Thank you, your Honor. May it 11 please the Court- 12 THE COURT: Good morning, Sir. 13 MR. WYLER: Good morning

we are 2q entitled t9 discovery on tlie issue of possession, ~00.211.DEPO (3376) f;squireSolutions. GQrt7 CA/ArCiitla:£1))0-P~ BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 3:44:22 PM HEARING June 03, 2020 CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS vs DAVE ARONBERG 9-12 Page 9 1 custody, and control. My understanding is th

nd we are 25 entitled to discovery on the issue of possession, ESQUIRE 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com CA/Arc«lfflg>Op022Q BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3 27 2023 3:44:22 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY ( HEARING CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS vs DAVE ARONBERG June 03, 2020 5-8 . !-!age :, Page 7 1 And