.. w/ cli~ni, ~e: hearing daie R\iJiewed:Pl's rvierrio oJ La\v opposing Aronberg's 57i10~ motion f6rfees.lsahctions ,RE!vie~1ed Pl's Respo11se ,to Aroriberg's r~qlle~t to sctie~tiie 57,,·105 ·motion for.tees after'MSJ' Review,ed Pl's Memo of Law opposing 57, i 0;i motion , , , - , , , , ••••.••·

a:nd jury rec·ords and the role of the State Attorney ,concerning such disdosure. Here, the results obtained were the maxinmin sought by Defendant Aroriberg ,as he was <;iismis~ed from the case; albeit not within th9 tinw CQ_nstraiI1ts o_(ihc ~a(c.:ha,r:bor provi_sion within § 57. i65, Fla,. Stat. Ther

ur Honor, is 5 that 905.27 requires a court order before the records 6 are unsealed. 7 THE COURT: Exactly. Exactly. 8 All right. Let me hear from Mr. Aroriberg's 9 attorney, Mr. Wyler. 10 MR. WYLER: Thank you, your Honor. May it 11 please the Court- 12 THE COURT: Good morning, Sir. 13 MR. WYLER: Good morning

.· . ·. . • -The total time Affiant's law finn has expended services reridered _to date is 74.8 -ho~rs, however, -fr()m !he __ date of Defendant Aroriberg' s 5 7. I 05 demand; Affiant' s law firm -has • • • . . ·• . • • •.. ·. . expen~ed a. total of 42.2 hours. Of the42.2 hours expended sin~e Defe