Epstein Secrets

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

discovering party. Failure to so report same shall result in sever.- consequences, including, without limitation, civil and criminal penalties. 6. The Final Order of this court dated March 24. 2009 shall be made a part hereof, and shall be incorporated by reference herein. 7. Any failure to comply with this Confidentiality

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

e discovering party. Failure to so report same shall result in severe consequences, including, without limitation. civil and criminal penalties. 6. The Final Order of this court dated March 24. 2009 shall be made a pan hereof, and shall be incorporated by reference herein. ust 7. failure Any to comply with this Confiden

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with,ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August.of 2009, but became suspicious. H

e discovering party. Failure to so report same shall result in severe consequences, including, without limitation, civil and criminal penalties. 6. The Final Order of this court dated March 24, 2009 shall be made a part hereof, and shall be incorporated by reference herein. 7. Any failure to comply with this Confidentiality