Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with. ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious.
or concealment by incurring additional attorney's fees, costs, and expenses in aggressively defending the civil actions whereas in reality, because the Civil Actions against Plaintiff were being exploited and over-valued so as to lure additional investors and to attempt to extort as much money as possible from EPSTEIN so as to co
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H
or concealment by incurring additional attorney's fees, costs, and expenses in aggressively defending the civil actions whereas in reality, because the Civil Actions against Plaintiff were being exploited and over-valued so as to lure additional investors and to attempt to extort as much money as possible from EPSTEIN so as to co
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H
or concealment by incurring additional attorney's fees, costs, and expenses in aggressively defending the civil actions whereas in reality, because the Civil Actions against Plaintiff were being exploited and over-valued so as to lure additional investors and to attempt to extort as much money as possible from EPSTEIN so as to co
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H
or concealment by incurring additional attorney's fees, costs, and expenses in aggressively defending the civil actions whereas in reality, because the Civil Actions against Plaintiff were being exploited and over-valued so as to lure additional investors and to attempt to extort as much money as possible from EPSTEIN so as to co
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H
or concealment by incurring additional attorney's fees, costs, and expenses in aggressively defending the civil actions whereas in reality, because the Civil Actions against Plaintiff were being exploited and over-valued so as to lure additional investors and to attempt to extort as much money as possible from EPSTEIN so as to co
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions, 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009. article as saying that he had met with, ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious.
or concealment by incurring additional attorney's fees, costs, and expenses in aggressively defending the civil actions whereas in reality, because the Civil Actions against Plaintiff were being exploited and over-valued so as to lure additional investors and to attempt to extort as much money as possible from EPSTEIN so as to co
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with,ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August.of 2009, but became suspicious. H
or concealment by incurring additional attorney's fees, costs, and expenses in aggressively defending the civil actions whereas in reality, because the Civil Actions against Plaintiff were being exploited and over-valued so as to lure additional investors and to attempt to extort as much money as possible from EPSTEIN so as to co
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (258)
Entities connected to both Alan Sakowitz and the Civil Actions against Plaintiff
Bradley Edwards
PERSON11 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
SR
Scott Rothstein
PERSON11 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON11 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
Judicial Circuit Court
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
RRA/Rothstein
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
WS
William Scherer
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
Luttier & Coleman
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
Bill Clinton
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
FP
Frank Preve
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
TM
Tommy Mottola
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
Donald Trump
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
David Copperfield
PERSON10 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON9 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
Adler, P.A.
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Alan·7 w/ the
TD Bank
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Alan·7 w/ the