Epstein Secrets

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

PAPMATIONSEAL Pauc 7 of I 3 EFTA00729497 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Under Sca]-Civ-Marra. EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JAN JONES INTERNATIONAL, INC. a/k/a ICON BY JAN JONES, Defendant-Appellee. In re EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Petitioners. Appeal from the U

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

ILATIONSEAL Pout 7 of 15 EFTA00795681 1 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Under Seal-Civ-Marra. EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. 4 c e JAN JONES INTERNATIONAL, INC. a/k/a ICON BY JAN JONES, Defendant-Appi in re EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Petitioners. O C. Appeal fro

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with,ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August.of 2009, but became suspicious. H

IltATIOXSEA L l'au.e or 15 EFTA00223361 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Under Seal-Civ-Marra. EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, I JAN JONES INTERNATIONAL, INC. a/k/a ICON BY JAN JONES, Defendant-Appellee. In re EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Petitioners. Appeal from the Un