Epstein Secrets

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

HER RELIEF This cause came before the Court at hearing on March 17, IS, 19 & 20 2009, upon plaintiffs', EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE (collectively "MORSE"), ore lends Motion to Seize Further Assets and ore Nina and subsequent written motions for other relief. The Court has carefully considered the or

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

ause came before the Court at hearing on March 17. 18, 19 & 20 2009, upon (collectively .,.. / Plaintiffs', EDWARD MORSE and CAROL (collectively "MORSE"), ore /gnus 4 6se Motion to Seize Further Assets and ore and quent written motions for other relief. The Court has carefully considered merit o

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with,ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August.of 2009, but became suspicious. H

HER RELIEF This cause came before the Court at hearing on March 17, 18, 19 & 20 2009, upon Plaintiffs', EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE (collectively "MORSE"), ore semis Motion to Seize Further Assets and ore few and subsequent written motions for other relief. The Court has eareftilly considered the or