Epstein Secrets

aneous: Respondent: Sharon Churcher; Jeffrey Epstein DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:15cv7433 OTHER DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:17mc00025 U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 17-01625 FILING DATE: 9/21/2015 JURISDICTION: Diversity JUDGE: Robert W. Sweet NATURE OF SUIT: 320 Assault, Libel & Slander FILING TYPE: Civil

0590 (917)-446-4641 Email:[email protected] Paul G Cassell [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] S.J. Quinney College of Law At The University of Utah 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT, USA 84112-0730 (801)-585-5202 Fax: (801)-585-2750 Email:[email protected] DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Jeffrey S. Pagliu

es statement contained in the report) will never be admissible unless there is a separate and independent hearsay exemptions for such statement. As the Second Circuit has clearly held: "It is well established that entries in a police report which result from the officer's own observations and knowledge may be adm

J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33301 Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake Cit iSU UT 12 J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Rd. South Salem NY 105 0 Is/ Nicole Simmons Nicole Simmons 3 EFTA00595624

rivacy interests of non- parties ... represents a legitimate basis for sealing judicial documents"). B. Effect of Previous Unsealing of Documents by Second Circuit Plaintiff claims that if a document is already public in another context, then it should be unsealed. She cites no law for this proposition, which

ICRIEGER KIM & LEWIN, LLP 500 Fifth Avenue New York. NY 10110 this Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support of Her on the following: Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Imran H. Ansari AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS, P.C. 546 Fifth Avenue 6th Floor New York, NY 10036 Jay M. Wolman Ma