3
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
4 / 3
Mentions
ers, Inc., Petitioners-Ap- pellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellant. No. 474, Docket 95-6119. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Aug. 81, 1996. Decided Oct. 17, 1996. Government appealed from order en- tered in the United States District Court for the Eastern Distri
ntied States Attorney for the Northern Ca; O'Mal- ley, William A., individually and in his capacity as District Attorney for Con- tra Costa County; Underwood, Lon, in- dividually and in his capacity as regis- trar of voters for Contra Costa County; Smith, Arlo, individually and in his ca- pacity as Distri
2006) 21 United States v. Stevens, 985 F.2d 1175 (2d Cir. 1993) 9, 12 United States v. Thomas, 116 F.3d 606 (2d Cir. 1997) 12 United States v. Underwood, No. 04 Cr. 424 (RWS), 2005 WL 927012, at ■1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2005) 10 United States v. Upton, 856 F. Supp. 727 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) 21 United Stat
Page: EFTA00031267 →on. See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); see also United States v. Coppa, 267 F.3d 132, 139-40 (2d Cir. 2001). Evidence is "material" in this sense only if "its suppression undermines confidence in the outcome of a trial." United States v. Bagley, 473
Page: EFTA00031274 →material." United States v. Persico, 645 F.3d 85, 111 (2d Cir. 2011) (citing cases). With regard to the timing of disclosing material under Giglio, the Second Circuit, in Coppa, rejected the argument that such material should be disclosed when defendants make a 7 EFTA00031274 --- PAGE BREAK --- demand for it.
Page: EFTA00031275 →his conclusion is not altered by the State's decision to seek ... damages on behalf of those who allegedly have been defrauded by GM."); New York by Underwood v. Larose Indus., 386 F. Supp. 3d 214, 218 n.3 (N.D.N.Y. 2019) (even if the state seeks victim-specific relief as one aspect of its case, "such dam
Page: EFTA00037105 →certain discrete claims asserted by the Attorney General ... does not necessarily negate the parens patriae nature of the action.").2 Courts outside the Second Circuit agree. See Illinois v. AU Optronics Corp., 794 F. Supp. 2d 845, 853 (ND. 111. 2011) ("As many courts have held, a State is not automatically rendere
Page: EFTA00037106 →Entities connected to both Second Circuit and Underwood

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONJeffrey Pagliuca
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Colorado
LOCATION