Epstein Secrets

of jail pending trial. Id. at *2, *9-10, *13 (citation omitted). Nonetheless, a band of other courts in our area have endorsed the procedure,' and the Second Circuit has affirmed its use, For reasons explained elsewhere, round-the-clock, privately funded security guards will virtually guarantee — not just reason

2015); United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Madoff, 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Schlegel, No. 06-CR-550, 2008 WL 11338900, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. June 13, 2008), modification denied, 2008 WL 11339654 (E.D.N.Y. July 2, 2008). See United States

rm T-I080 (rev.12-13) EFTA00074903 Case 20-2413, Document 10-1, 07/30/2020, 2896538, Page2 of 38 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit —against — GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendant-Appellant, ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRIC

n 29 Certificate of Service 31 EFTA00074905 Case 20-2413, Document 10-1, 07/30/2020, 2896538, Page4 of 38 Table of Authorities Cases Blum v. Schlegel, 108 F.3d 1369 (2d Cir. 1997) 12 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019) passim Dubose v. Pierce, 487 U.S. 1229 (1988) 15 Dubose v. Pie

of jail pending trial. Id. at *2, *9-10, *13 (citation omitted). Nonetheless, a band of other courts in our area have endorsed the procedure,' and the Second Circuit has affirmed its use.' For reasons explained elsewhere, round-the-clock, privately funded security guards will virtually guarantee — not just reaso

2015); United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Madoff, 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Schlegel, No. 06-CR-550, 2008 WL 11338900, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. June 13, 2008), modification denied, 2008 WL 11339654 (E.D.N.Y. July 2, 2008). See United States

of jail pending trial. Id. at *2, *9-10, *13 (citation omitted). Nonetheless, a band of other courts in our area have endorsed the procedure,' and the Second Circuit has affirmed its use.' For reasons explained elsewhere, round-the-clock, privately funded security guards will virtually guarantee — not just reaso

2015); United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Madoff, 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Schlegel, No. 06-CR-550, 2008 WL 11338900, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. June 13, 2008), modification denied, 2008 WL 11339654 (E.D.N.Y. July 2, 2008). See United States

of jail pending trial. Id. at *2, *9-10, *13 (citation omitted). Nonetheless, a band of other courts in our area have endorsed the procedure,' and the Second Circuit has affirmed its use, For reasons explained elsewhere, round-the-clock, privately funded security guards will virtually guarantee — not just reason

2015); United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Madoff, 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Schlegel, No. 06-CR-550, 2008 WL 11338900, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. June 13, 2008), modification denied, 2008 WL 11339654 (E.D.N.Y. July 2, 2008). See United States

other than plaintiff] who was 17 at this point." Id. 121. None of these questions and answers was used in the summary judgment papers or released by the Second Circuit. The transcript containing this testimony is sealed. 2. The Court should commence proceedings to vindicate the government and plaintiff's violation

nment had no ability legally to obtain the deposition transcripts. In Martindell v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291, 293 (2d Cir. 1979), cited with approval in In re Teligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53, 58 (2d Cir. 2011), the government moved in a civil action to which it was not a par

deposition transcripts and enter an order to show cause why the person(s) who violated the Order should not be held in contempt. See, e.g., Blum v. Schlegel, 108 F.3d 1369 (2d Cir. 1997); Hunt v. Enzo Biochem, Inc., 904 F. Supp. 2d 337, 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). 3. The indictment provides a compelling reaso