3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
r a portion of the deposition Mr. gave in the Maxwell case, which is troubling because it was subject to confidentiality in that case and, although the Second Circuit has ordered the unsealing of the summary judgment papers (which likely include references to Mr. deposition testimony), no mandate has issued or d
Page: EFTA00020952 →should know about some recent developments. For the last week or so the New York Times (Mike McIntire) has been aggressively reaching out to Mr. =, Jesse Rose this employment lawyer) and me (who represented him in the Maxwell case) by email and hone, as well comiaiMr. home twice. He is seeking our comment
Page: EFTA00020952 →r a portion of the deposition Mr. gave in the Maxwell case, which is troubling because it was subject to confidentiality in that case and, although the Second Circuit has ordered the unsealing of the summary judgment papers (which likely include references to Mr. deposition testimony), no mandate has issued or d
Page: EFTA00027375 →should know about some recent developments. For the last week or so the New York Times (Mike McIntire) has been aggressively reaching out to Mr. =, Jesse Rose this employment lawyer) and me (who represented him in the Maxwell case) by email andi , as wella to Mr. home twice. He is seeking our comments a
Page: EFTA00027375 →ll or a portion of the deposition gave in the Maxwell case, which is troubling because it was subject to confidentiality in that case and, although the Second Circuit has ordered the unsealing of the summary judgment papers (which likely include references to=EM:leposition testimony), no mandate has issued or doc
ht you should know about some recent developments. For the last week or so the New York Times (Mike McIntire) has been aggressively reaching out to- Jesse Rose (his .m I m lawyer) and me (who represented him in the Maxwell case) by email and phone, as well comin to ome twice. He is seeking our comments a
Entities connected to both Second Circuit and Jesse Rose