Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Grp. Ltd., LLC v. Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P., No. 13 CIV. 1654 RA HBP, 2014 WL 5420225, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2014). In United States v. Lavender, the Second Circuit held that while a defendant could not file an interlocutory appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to quash a third-party subpoena, he
(1984) 5 United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12 United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2008) 10 United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2013) 5, 6, 7 United States v. Taylor, 745 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 2014) 12 US Bank Nat. Ass 'n v. PHL Variable Ins. Co., No. 12
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Grp. Ltd., LLC v. Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P., No. 13 CIV. 1654 RA HBP, 2014 WL 5420225, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2014). In United States v. Lavender, the Second Circuit held that while a defendant could not file an interlocutory appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to quash a third-party subpoena, he
(1984) 5 United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12 United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2008) 10 United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2013) 5, 6, 7 United States v. Taylor, 745 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 2014) 12 US Bank Nat. Ass 'n v. PHL Variable Ins. Co., No. 12
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Grp. Ltd., LLC v. Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P., No. 13 CIV. 1654 RA HBP, 2014 WL 5420225, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2014). In United States v. Lavender, the Second Circuit held that while a defendant could not file an interlocutory appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to quash a third-party subpoena, he
(1984) 5 United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12 United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2008) 10 United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2013) 5, 6, 7 United States v. Taylor, 745 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 2014) 12 US Bank Nat. Ass 'n v. PHL Variable Ins. Co., No. 12
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00018999
(1984) 5 United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12 United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2008) 10 United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2013) 5, 6, 7 United States v. Taylor, 745 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 2014) 12 US Bank Nat. Ass 'n v. PHL Variable Ins. Co., No. 12
Page: EFTA00018999 →Page EFTA00019003
Grp. Ltd., LLC v. Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P., No. 13 CIV. 1654 RA HBP, 2014 WL 5420225, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2014). In United States v. Lavender, the Second Circuit held that while a defendant could not file an interlocutory appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to quash a third-party subpoena, he
Page: EFTA00019003 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (448)
Entities connected to both Second Circuit and Stokes
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON336 w/ Second·21 w/ Stokes
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON287 w/ Second·37 w/ Stokes
United States
LOCATION159 w/ Second·27 w/ Stokes
the Southern District
LOCATION116 w/ Second·14 w/ Stokes
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION110 w/ Second·10 w/ Stokes
Prince Andrew
PERSON107 w/ Second·13 w/ Stokes
Julie K. Brown
PERSON93 w/ Second·21 w/ Stokes
Bradley Edwards
PERSON88 w/ Second·13 w/ Stokes
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON92 w/ Second·8 w/ Stokes
Michael Cohen
PERSON87 w/ Second·6 w/ Stokes
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION78 w/ Second·13 w/ Stokes
George W. Bush
PERSON58 w/ Second·26 w/ Stokes
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION73 w/ Second·10 w/ Stokes
David Boies
PERSON67 w/ Second·14 w/ Stokes
JP
Jeffrey Pagliuca
PERSON70 w/ Second·9 w/ Stokes
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON63 w/ Second·14 w/ Stokes
Michael Jackson
PERSON57 w/ Second·16 w/ Stokes
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON57 w/ Second·13 w/ Stokes
Stephen Hawking
PERSON53 w/ Second·17 w/ Stokes
Donald Trump
PERSON58 w/ Second·9 w/ Stokes