Epstein Secrets

anxiety" and "emotional distress" he suffered as a result of Epstein's filing and continuation of this lawsuit. At the March 8, 2018 hearing, Judge Hafele himself recognized no less than six times that Edwards' counterclaim for malicious prosecution against Epstein had its 4 EFTA00793696 genesis in

se or e en ant Scott Rothstein Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Jack A. Goldberger WA HAND DELIVERY Atterbu , Goldber er & Weiss, P.A. The Honorable Donald W. Hafele uite 1400 Palm Beach County Courthouse 1 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10.1216 o- outzse or amt minter- West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Defendant Jeffr

g all counts were interrelated). BACKGROUNDS This unique and complex case arose from the 2009 implosion of the Fort Lauderdale law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, where defendant/counter- plaintiff Bradley Edwards worked and held himself out as a partner. The principal of the firm, defendant Scott Rothstein,

urt matter. MR. SCAROLA: We are. MR. LINK: I may have misunderstood, because this is a bankruptcy declaration. And there isn't anything in Judge Hafele's order that talks about bankruptcy testimony or spoke that you can inquire about. Obviously, by signing this he has adopted every statement in t

m from a disc that we started reviewing on February 25th, 2018? I think that's a legitimate question, pursuant to both -- well, pursuant to Judge Hafele's order, not pursuant to the bankruptcy order. But your question hasn't been tailored that way. MR. SCAROLA: And that's because that's not the q

unsel to the bankruptcy trustee. A I don't recall. Q Did you ever come to learn that the trustee in the bankruptcy for the law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, had been subpoenaed to produce emails contained on the server of that law firm? A I don't recall. DRAFT !!!! NOT PROOFREAD EFTA00804174 14

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I think that's a legitimate question, pursuant to both -- well, pursuant to Judge Hafele's order, not pursuant to the bankruptcy order. But your question hasn't been tailored that way. MR. SCAROLA: And that's because that's not the q

ourt matter. MR. SCAROLA: We are. MR. LINK: I may have misunderstood, because this is a bankruptcy declaration. And there isn't anything in Judge Hafele's order that talks about bankruptcy testimony or spoke that you can inquire about. Obviously, by signing this, he has adopted every statement in

of 97 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 in the bankruptcy for the law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler had been subpoenaed to produce emails contained on the server of that law firm? A I don't recall. Q Did it ever come to your attention that ema

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I think that's a legitimate question, pursuant to both -- well, pursuant to Judge Hafele's order, not pursuant to the bankruptcy order. But your question hasn't been tailored that way. MR. SCAROLA: And that's because that's not the q

else did he tell you? MR. LINK: So, I'm going to instruct you not to answer based both on attorney- client privilege and exceeds the scope of Judge Hafele's order. I" Epstein Depo. Tr. at 22. Clearly Epstein put forward the conversation with his attorney about the disc in paragraph four of his declara

of 165 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 in the bankruptcy for the law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler had been subpoenaed to produce emails contained on the server of that law firm? A I don't recall. Q Did it ever come to your attention that ema