Epstein Secrets

's 14 deadlines. Id. at p. 144; lines 6-14. As Epstein asserts in his affidavit, he does not feel that he can receive a fair hearing before Judge Hafele, particularly in light of the Judge's repeated comments regarding his wealth, his choice of counsel, and his determination of his assertion of privi

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFEND

e time you were employed by RRA (or that is being claimed by the Trustee). 20. In the attached transcript dated July 31, 2009, you stated to Judge Hafele with regard to the E.W. and L.M. cases the following: 5 EFTA00606616 "What the evidence is really going to show Is that Mr. Epstein — at least

STEIN, Plaintiff, vs. @001/o05 onfifro SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, IndNIdually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, and L.M., Individually, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 602009CA040800XXXXMBAG DEFENDANT BRADLEY J. EDWARDS RESPONSE T

specific tangible need arises in a civil case the relief should be sought in that case.' In other words, the Civil cases which are in front of Judge Hafele is one forum that Judge Marra said go to it. Judge Marra did not say that this Court does not have Jurisdiction to unseal its own sealed records or

egulation, Case No. 91-2108 (Fla. 2d Jud. Cir.), Order Releasing Public Records dated September 20, 1991 7 8 2 EFTA00233745 oq-a-3-714 1. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION CASE MOs.: 2006-CF9454 AXX and 2008-CP9381 AXX STATE OF