Epstein Secrets

er. Ultimately, following a summary judgment motion by Edwards, Epstein dropped his lawsuit; currently pending before Judge Crow's successor, Judge Hafele, is a follow-on action, Edwards v. Epstein, for malicious prosecution by Epstein in filing his lawsuit in the first place. 6 EFTA00799319 Case 0

ng to secure thousands of attorney communications by Fanner Jaffe attorney Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., who while previously employed as an attorney at Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler ("RRA") had represented a number of Epstein's victims in their civil suits against Epstein. Farmer Jaffe sought to have Epstein bear the costs of c

s and costs in his defense of those claims. In addition, when we identified several key case-ending e-mails from the disc as trial exhibits, Judge Hafele struck those exhibits as untimely. Furthermore, Judge Hafele did not want to make any rulings in derogation of the Bankruptcy Court's Order if Fowle

Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards 15'h Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMBAG In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-RBR Dear Niall and Joe: I am writing on behalf of my client, Jeffrey

specific tangible need arises in a civil case the relief should be sought in that case.' In other words, the Civil cases which are in front of Judge Hafele is one forum that Judge Marra said go to it. Judge Marra did not say that this Court does not have Jurisdiction to unseal its own sealed records or

ndant ROBERT CRITTON, JR., ESQUIRE Burman, Critton, et al. On behalf of Third Party E.W. WILLIAM J. BERGER, ESQUIRE BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler On behalf of Third Party, The Post DEANNA SHULLMAN, ESQUIRE Thomas, LoCiero & Bralow, PL EFTA00233747 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13