Epstein Secrets

is a good faith belief that evidence may be lost, the Court has the authority to enter an order preserving such evidence. See AT & T Mobility LLC v. Dynamic Cellular Corp., No. 08-20537-Civ., 2008 WL 2139518, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2008); see also Trac/one Wireless. Inc. v. King Trading, Inc., No. 3-08-CV-0398-B, 200

. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON _____________ _____,/ C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON I CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON 2 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 114 Entered

ith belief that evidence may be lost or destroyed, the Court has the authority to enter an order preserving such evidence. See AT&T Mobility LLC v. Dynamic Cellular Corp., 2008 WL 2139518 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2008); Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. King Trading, Inc., 2008 WL 918243, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2008) (finding "

T. S.D. OF FLA. - W.P.B. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE, & INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW (AS TO JANE DOE v. EPSTEIN, Case No. 08-CIV-80893 Marra/Johnson) Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, pur

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this court has the authority to modify the normal time limitations under the Rules. See AT&T Mobility LLC v. Dynamic Cellular Corp., 2008 WL 2139518 (S.D. Fla. 2008); see also Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. King Trading, Inc., 2008 WL 918243 (N.D. Tex. 2008). Additionally, when there

2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOIINSON JANE DOE, a/k/a, JANE DOE NO. I, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, S SN1 and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE AND EXPEDITE CERTAIN D

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this court has the authority to modify the normal time limitations under the Rules. See AT&T Mobility LLC v. Dynamic Cellular Corp., 2008 WL 2139518 (S.D. Fla. 2008); see also Tradone Wireless, Inc. v.King Trading, Inc., 2008 WL 918243 (N.D. Tex. 2008). Additionally, when there

age 2 of 4 judicial notice of a similar motion and its attachments filed at Docket Entry 12 in the separate case filed in this court by the name of JANE DOE, a/k/a. JANE DOE NO. 1 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al. Case NO. 08-80804-CIV-MARRADOMISON 5. This evidence is relevant and critical to the prosecution of