Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008).12 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not to be granted until the
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008).12 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not to be granted until the
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008).12 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not to be granted until the
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (158)
Entities connected to both Axiom Worldwide, Inc. and v. Lir Joe Records
Paul Cassell
PERSON5 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON5 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON5 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
MP
Michael J. Pike
PERSON5 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON5 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON5 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
United States
LOCATION4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
West Palm Beach
LOCATION4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
Murray
PERSON4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
the United States Government
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
Phoenix
LOCATION4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
Michael Douglas
PERSON4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
New Hampshire
LOCATION4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
Joe Biden
PERSON4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
GA
Garcia
PERSON4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
Weissing
PERSON4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.
Jay Howell
PERSON4 w/ Axiom·3 w/ v.