Epstein Secrets

tate a claim upon which relief can be granted. It is well settled that this Court is to apply Florida substantive law in this action. Erie R.Co. v. Tompkins, 58 S.Ct. 817 (1938). Pursuant to Florida law, although the term "assault and battery" is most commonly referred to as if it were a legal unit, or a

tion fel Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Clerk to Enter Default Against Defendant, or Alternatively, for an Enlgargentent of Time to Serve Process, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Replies due by 6/23/2008. (Attachments: #J. Affidavit for Richard Barnett)(Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 06/13/2008) 06/20

state a claim upon which relief can be wanted. It is well settled that this Court is to apply Florida substantive law in this action. Erie R.Co.l. Tompkins 58 S.Ct. 817 (1938). Pursuant to Florida law, although the term "assault and battery" is most commonly referred to as if it were a legal unit, or a

Motion re 23 MOTION for Protective Order Against Piecemeal Depositions ofJane Doe No. 4, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Replies due by 4/27/2009. (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 04/17/2009) 04/17/2009 al Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to

not present a federal court should hesitate to exercise jurisdiction over state claims, even though bound to apply state law to them, Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64.Needless decisions of state law [by a federal court) should be avoided both as a matter of comity and to promote justice between the p

Plaintiffs MOTION to Preserve Evidence Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Jane Doe No. 101, Jane Doe No. 102. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A", # 2 Exhibit "B", # 3 Text of Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-K

1965). As jurisdiction is based on diversity, it is well settled that this Court is to apply Florida substantive law in this action. Erie R.Co. v. Tompkins, 58 S.Ct. 817 (1938). On its face, Count I completely fails to allege either the necessary elements of any cause of action or the necessary underly

tyle of This Case and Motion to 'den* II in Third arty Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternative y, Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte , with Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 5/18/2009 (Attachments: # I Motion to Compel and or Identify, # 2 Motion to Compel and or IdentifyXPike, Micha