Epstein Secrets

tion. A21 EFTA00798187 Court of Appeal reversed and remanded in November 2015, with the Mandate issuing in December 2015. The matter was sent to the Florida Supreme Court and, in large part, there were no substantive filings in this case until June 2017, after the Supreme Court declined jurisdiction. Defendant notice

ial set 10-day trial commencing on December 5, 2017, and to extend the pre-trial deadlines. In the alternative, Plaintiff moves under Rule 1.270 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure to bifurcate the trial and limit the first stage of the proceedings to: (i) Plaintiff's case and damages against Defendant Scott Rothstein and (ii)

l Procedure. Specifically, the requisite of a "bone-tide termination of the original proceeding in favor of the present plaintiff" as delineated by the Florida Supreme Court as one of the legally-mandated elements to bring forth a Malicious Prosecution claim, has not been, nor can it be, satisfied. See 6 EFTA00299004

EDWARDS' COUNTERCLAIM Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.110 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files his Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards' ("Edwards") Counterclaim, and states: 1. Epstein

l Procedure. Specifically, the requisite of a "bone-fide termination of the original proceeding in favor of the present plaintiff' as delineated by the Florida Supreme Court as one of the legally-mandated elements to bring forth a Malicious Prosecution claim, has not, nor can it, be satisfied. See Alamo rent-A-Car v. Ma

EDWARDS' COUNTERCLAIM Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.110 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files his Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards' ("Edwards") Counterclaim, and states: 1. Epstein