Epstein Secrets

ns is of no moment in these proceedings. The alleged privileged e-mails and all issues related to privilege and waiver are currently pending before the State Court. CONCLUSION As the sole basis for seeking to hold Epstein liable for a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order, Movants contend that Epstein's

ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN, PLLC By: /s/ Chad P. Pugatch CHAD P. PUGATCH (FBN [email protected] - AND — I hereby certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this Court set forth in Local Rule 20

o answer those questions is of no moment. The alleged privileged e-mails and all issues related to privilege and waiver are currently pending before the State Court. 5 EFTA00794242 CONCLUSION As the sole basis for seeking to hold Epstein liable for a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order, Edwards cont

ow. 6 EFTA00794243 RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & By: /s/ had P. Pu atch CHAD P. PUGATCH (FBN - AND - I hereby certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this Court set forth in Local Rule 20

ns is of no moment in these proceedings. The alleged privileged e-mails and all issues related to privilege and waiver are currently pending before the State Court. CONCLUSION As the sole basis for seeking to hold Epstein liable for a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order, Edwards contends that Epstein'

vice list below. RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & OM By: Is/ Chad P. Pu atch CHAD P. PUGATCH (FBN - AND - I hereby certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this Court set forth in Local Rule 20

ed the adequacy of Mr. Edwards's privilege log years ago. 6 EFTA00795932 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6358 Filed 04/12/18 Page 7 of 12 At one point, the State Court—the only Court with jurisdiction over the adequacy of the log— agreed that the log was insufficient and then before requiring a revised log reversed

and by email or U.S. Mail on those parties listed on the attached service list this 12th day of April, 2018. I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 20