5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
lanation for why victim exhibited behavioral manifestations of sexually abused child.). 14. In further support of Defendant's motion, See Balas v. Ruzzo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1998), as it is on point to the discovery issues in this action, and the rele
-polar disorder are more than simple allegations of emotional distress thus placing plaintiffs mental condition at issue). See also United States v. Bear Stops, 997 F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1993)( dealing with "admissibility of other acts of sexual abuse by individuals Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 362 E
requested information is not relevant? 7. Next, despite Plaintiffs' strained interpretation and application of the discovery requests in Balas v. Ruzzo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1998), that case is instrumental in that, once again, we are at the "discovery
complaints. See infra. b. Argument 5. The information sought above is relevant and discoverable even if not admissible at trial. United States v. Bear Stops, 997 F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1993) deals with "admissibility of other acts of sexual abuse by individuals other than the defendant to explain why a victi
n medical doctors is a basic discovery need related to the claims alleged by JANE DOE for which Plaintiff's counsel refuses to compromise. Balas v. Ruzzo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 8 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 91 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009
d on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009 Page 9 of 11 1998)(discoverability of Plaintiff's history of sexual activity is relevant to damages); United States v. Bear Stops, 997 F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1993)(deals with "admissibility of other acts of sexual abuse by individuals other than the defendant to explain why a vict
anation for why victim exhibited behavioral manifestations of sexually abused child.). In further support of Defendant's motion, a copy of Balas v. Ruzzo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1998), is attached hereto as Exhibit A as it is on point to the discovery iss
in her complaint, and whether she suffered injury and damages as a result of the other claimed sexual misconduct with males. See United States v. Bear Stops, 997 F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1993)(Defendant charged with sexual abuse of six year old boy was entitled to admission of evidence relating to victim's se
08-cv-80119-KAM Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2009 Page 9 of 13 Page9 States v. Bear Stops. 997 F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1993); Balas v. Ruzzo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1998). The information sought in 4(e) is relevant and discoverable even if no
at same right in the instant matters. 8 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2009 Page 9 of 13 Page9 States v. Bear Stops. 997 F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1993); Balas v. Ruzzo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1998). The information sought in
Entities connected to both Ruzzo and Bear Stops

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONMichael J. Pike
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSONBalas
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSONAtterbury Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATION
Kenneth Marra
PERSONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATIONRobert D. Critton
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONDonahay
PERSONBruce E. Reinhart
PERSONMcGregor Electronic Industries, Inc.
ORGANIZATIONFlorida Bar
ORGANIZATION
George Mitchell
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSON