Epstein Secrets

to a modification of the marital settlement agreement which specifically provided that the Former Wife could permanently relocate the children to the State of Utah in June of 1998. In accordance with the 1996 agreement, the Former Wife purchased property in Utah. sold the home where she and the children were

0825 requirements for a stay rests with the party requesting the stay. A trial court is not obligated, or even encouraged, to enter such a stay as the Appellate Rules specifically provide, "In the absence of a stay, during the pendency of a review of a non-final order, the lower tribunal may proceed with all matt

to a modification of the marital settlement agreement which specifically provided that the Former Wife could permanently relocate the children to the State of Utah in June of 1998. In accordance with the 1996 agreement, the Former Wife purchased property in Utah, sold the home where she and the children were

1325 requirements for a stay rests with the party requesting the stay. A trial court is not obligated, or even encouraged, to enter such a stay as the Appellate Rules specifically provide, "In the absence of a stay, during the pendency of a review of a non•final order, the lower tribunal may proceed with all matt

to a modification of the marital settlement agreement which specifically provided that the Former Wife could permanently relocate the children to the State of Utah in June of 1998. In accordance with the 1996 agreement, the Former Wife purchased property in Utah. sold the home where she and the children were

2445 requirements for a stay rests with the party requesting the stay. A trial court is not obligated, or even encouraged, to enter such a stay as the Appellate Rules specifically provide, "In the absence of a stay, during the pendency of a review of a non-final order, the lower tribunal may proceed with all matt