Epstein Secrets

ved this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 7th day of January, 2009: Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 L m k Worth FL 33461 imo s Fax: C unse or ainti Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. H

by Judge William J. Zloch on 8/6/2008. (bc) (Entered: 08/06/2008) 08/07/2008 12 I 173 KB MOTION to Reassign Case TO JUDGE KENNETH MARRA by . (Willits, Richard) (Entered: 08/07/2008) 08/07/2008 B r 34.1 KB MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 6 Sealed Document, 7 Sealed Document TO MOTION TO STAY file

, Part III, p. 11-18). Plaintiff's reliance on Tachiona v. Mugabe, 216 F.Supp.2d 262 (S.D.N.Y. 2002), is misplaced as the federal statute at issue, the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), is clearly distinguishable. (Plaintiffs response, p. 11). See endnote 3 for relevant text.' Unlike §2255 which expressly provides that a su

3401 Bruce E. Reinhart, Esquire Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Robert Critton, Esquire West Palm Beach. FL 33414 Richard H. Willits, Esquire Richard H. Willits, P.A. Lake Worth, FL 33461 EFTA00201228

For example, in Tachiona v. Mugabe, 216 F.Supp.2d 262 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) the court upheld an award of compensatory damages and punitive damages under the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) even though the language of TVPA provided no methodology for determining the amount or type of damages. The TVPA simply provides that "an in

served this day on all counsel of reco d identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of May , 2009: Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.

, Part III, p. 11-18). Plaintiff's reliance on Tachiona v. Mugabe, 216 F.Supp.2d 262 (S.D.N.Y. 2002), is misplaced as the federal statute at issue, the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), is clearly distinguishable. (Plaintiffs response, p. 11). See endnote 3 for relevant text.3 Unlike §2255 which expressly provides that a suc