Epstein Secrets

ACTIVE 696232185v3 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, Publisher of THE PALM BEACH POST, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH ABRUZZO, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palm Beach County, Florida, Defendant. CASE NO.:

RUZZO, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palm Beach County, Florida, Defendant. CASE NO.: 50-2019-CA-014681-XXXX- MB Div.: AG SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CA Florida Holdings, LLC, publisher of The Palm Beach Post, for its Second Amended Complaint against Joseph Abruzzo, the Clerk of the Court and Comptroller for Palm Beach C

behalf of its journalists and the public it serves “unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” NOT A CERTIFIED COPY 16 ACTIVE 696232185v3 Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State of Florida, 210 So. 3d 1243, 1263 (Fla. 2017); see also Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 711 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (noting that “the press’ funct

'Filing # 101840557 E-Filed 01/17/2020 12:23:06 PM CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, Publisher of THEPALMBEACH POST, Plaintiff, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 50

ccess to information The Palm Beach Post seeks on behalf of its journalists and the public it serves “unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State ofFlorida, 210 So. 3d 1243, 1263 (Fla. 2017); see also Zerilli v Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 711 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (noting that “the press’ function

iling # 101840557 E-Filed 01/17/2020 12:23:06 PM i i ! | IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, Publisher of THE PALMBEACH POST, CASE NO.: 50-2019-CA-O14681-XXXX-MB Div.: AG Plaintiff, v. DAVE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of Palm Beach County, F

ccess to information The Palm Beach Post seeks on behalf of its journalists and the public it serves “unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State ofFlorida, 210 So. 3d 1243, 1263 (Fla. 2017); see also Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 711 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (noting that “the press’ functio