Epstein Secrets

ant Jeffrey Epstein Date Filed: 05/01/2009 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question represented by Katherine Warthen Ezell Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg et al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami FL 33130-1780 Fax: Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATT

filed by Jane Doe No. 101.(Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/01/2009) 05/01/2009 8 r 173 KB RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Jane Doe No. 101. (Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/01/2009) 05/01/2009 9 ri 61.2 KB First AMENDED COMPLAINT and Demand For Jury Trial, filed by Jane Doe No. 101.(Ezell

e 6 of 7 Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for a No-Contact Order filed by Jane Doe No. 101, Jane Doe No. 102. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 06/04/2009) 06/04/2009 28 ORDER STRIKING (112 in 9:08-cv-80381-ICAM, 111 in 9:08-cv-80232- KAM, 136 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM, 11

not present a federal court should hesitate to exercise jurisdiction over state claims, even though bound to apply state law to them, Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64.Needless decisions of state law [by a federal court) should be avoided both as a matter of comity and to promote justice between the p

e to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs Reponse In Opposition to Defendant Jay Epstein's Motion to Dismiss by Jane Doe No. 101. (Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/21/2009) 05/21/2009 98 2r .2 0 KB RESPONSE/REPLY to 89 Plaintiffs MOTION to Strike Z8 Reply to Response to Motion to

ant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint For Failure to State a Cause of Action and Motion for More Definite Statement by Jane Doe No. 101. (Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/21/2009) 05/27/2009 99 NOTICE by Jane Doe re (111 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Plaintiffs httns://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bi

1965). As jurisdiction is based on diversity, it is well settled that this Court is to apply Florida substantive law in this action. Erie R.Co. v. Tompkins, 58 S.Ct. 817 (1938). On its face, Count I completely fails to allege either the necessary elements of any cause of action or the necessary underly

d Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Str

inst Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein". Erie R.Co. v. Tompkins, 58 S.Ct. 817 (1938). Accordingly, the privileges