Epstein Secrets

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 148 EAST 78Th NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LEFCOURT [email protected] SHERYL E. REICH NIcletcourtlawoom RENATO C. STABILE slabIle&elcourIlawcorn FAITH A. FRIEDMAN [email protected] BY FEDERAL EXPRESS TELEPHONE FACSIMILE July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., Fi

s used by the defendant, an all but irrefutable case showing the clear knowledge and intent of the defendant. A prototypical case is United States' Farner, 251 F.3d 510 (5th Cir. 2001), where the defendant participated, over time, in instant messaging, e-mail, and follow-up telephone calls with a pers

SIONAL CORPORATION 148 EAST 78" STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LEFCOURT lefccitul@letcourtlaw corn SHERYL E. REICH NideilkOuNsw.com RENATO C. STABILE stablefcaurlaw.com FAITH A. FRIEDMAN flriolmsnalccostlawcom BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States

s used by the defendant, an all but irrefutable case showing the clear knowledge and intent of the defendant. A prototypical case is United States' Farner, 251 F.3d 510 (5th Cir. 2001), where the defendant participated, over time, in instant messaging, e-mail, and follow-up telephone calls with a pers

ices Of GERALD B. LEpcouErr, P.C. A PROTESSIONAL CORPORATION 148 EAST 18" STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LEFCOURT SHERYL C. REICH RENATO C. STABILE FAITH A. FRIEDMAN BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Esq., Chief, Criminal Division tates Attorney's Of

used by the defendant, an all but irrefutable case showing the clear knowledge and intent of the defendant. A prototypical case is United States v. Farner, 251 F.3d 510 (5th Cir. 2001), where the defendant participated, over time, in instant messaging, e-mail, and follow-up telephone calls with a pers

LAW orricr.s OF that.an B. LEFcarsirr, P.G. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION GERALD B. LEFCOURT SHERYL E. REICH RENATO C. STABILE FAITH A. FRIEDMAN BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 First Assistant United States Attorney ., Chief, Criminal Division e United States Attorney's O

used by the defendant, an all but irrefutable case showing the clear knowledge and intent of the defendant. A prototypical case is United States v. Farner, 251 F.3d 510 (5* Cir. 2001), where the defendant participated, over time, in instant messaging, e-mail, and follow-up telephone calls with a perso