Epstein Secrets

laced. In the Amended 1999 Note, the parties stipu- lated only that IOUs note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York, including matters of construction, validity and per- formance, without giving effect to princi- ples of conflicts of law .... (Mem. Of Law in Supp

F.34 at 1422). In Count I, plaintiffs allege that the defendants' conduct "constituted the mak- ing of fraudulent misrepresentations ... regarding the AIG Investment" that the defendants knew were materially mislead- ing "because of their failure to state or disclose the additional or qualifying infor- mation re

placed. In the Amended 1999 Note, the parties stipulated only that [t]his note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York, including matters of construction, validity and performance, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law . . . . (Mem. Of Law in Sup

he Amended 1999 Note. (Id. Ex. A at 8-9; Ex. B at 7-8; Ex. D at 10; Ex. E at 2-3.) Sometime in the spring of 2001, Epstein and FTC discovered that the AIG Investment was "suddenly and rapidly deteriorating." (Pls.' Mem. Of Law in Opp'n to Mot. To Dismiss, Epstein Decl. 1 20.) According to the plaintiffs, FTC's a

s of the State of Ohio and resided at One Whitsibarn Road, New Albany, Ohio 43054. 3. Defendant, Jeffrey B. irstein, is a resident and citizen of the State of New York. Jeffrey E. Epstein, was at all arti ispieze 4 fitel ttotlittli Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 4mq ORMli UW040)0704 EFTA00228084 relevant times,

) In follow-up telephone conversations during that same two week period, Davison and her associates made additional specific representations about the AIG Investment, without disclosing Citibank and AIG's relationship. Davison also during that period represented that Citibank had "done their due diligence" and