Epstein Secrets

that RBA's trust accounts were maintained with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Florida Bar, and that at:7.gs to balances in the trust accounts was allegedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. 17. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and o

mitted, COFFEY BURLINGTON Counsel for Plaindffs 2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 858-2900 B OS I LLADNECIV FEIN Florida Bar . 259861 Annexed hereto as Exhibit A is an affidavit from Plaintiff Rosenfeldt attesting to the truthfulness of the allegations contained herein.

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied in a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00729489 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

s inappropriate. 16 You can't assign a personal injury cause of action, 17 et cetera. 18 THE COURT: Well, why does that concern me 19 and not the Florida Bar and the Federal and State 20 authorities? 21 MR. CRITTON: Because if LM or EW, for 22 purposes of this case, assigned a portion — all or 23 a

ITTON: Judge, I think, from a 20 practical standpoint, with regard to the 21 preservation of evidence, the Federal Court order 22 takes care of the Federal Court did not deal 23 with Mr. Edwards at all; although, he was agreeable 24 to entering into a preservation order, because they 25 said it appears t

and this is 21 important — we are heavily involved in making sure 22 that clients' rights of the firm are being 23 protected. 24 We met with the Florida Bar. They're in full 25 agreement with what we're doing, and that would be Page 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 s

that order was entered prior to Mr. Stettin being appointed last week, so... 711E COURT: All right. MR. LICHTMAN: Your Honor, we repie:,ented to the Federal Court and the state court that of course we're preserving evidence. THE COURT: Okay. All right. Is there anyone else that wishes to be heard? No. So w

e supervising attorney over each of the Epstein Cases. In late November 2009, Epstein was also alerted that as a result of the Ponzi scheme at RRA, the Florida Bar had commenced investigations into approximately 40 of the 70 attorneys employed by RRA. At or about the same time in November 2009, the press repor

t the exact time, according to both Rothstein and the Federal government, that the Ponzi scheme was unraveling. Just days before the RRA implosion, the Federal Court rejected Edwards's bond motion, stating that it was "entirely devoid of evidence." Finally, while Epstein's suit was pending against Edwards, Scott

THSTEIN investors that RRA's trust accounts in ned with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with d regulations of the Florida Bar, and that access to balances in the trust accoun I egedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. 17. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co

hat all deadlines in this Order arc satisfied in a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 016 EFTA00795673 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

or MORSE shall appear before this Court and testify, under oath. as to his receipt of these funds, under penalty of perjury and subject to action by the Florida Bar; .. 22. That based upon argument and representations of MORSE's counsel, made under oath; MORSE is suffering from significant financial distress du

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied In a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00193900 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

that RRA's trust accounts were maintained with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Florida Bar, and that access to balances in the trust accounts was allegedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. 17. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and ot

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied In a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00223353 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may bo enforced in either venue; and 29