Epstein Secrets

communications by you and Mr. Edwards, as attorneys, with the media are also limited by the requirements of Rule 4-3.6 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Rule 4-3.6., entitled "Trial Publicity," states: (a) Prejudicial Extrajudicial Statements Prohibited. A lawyer shall not make an extrajudicial sta

ublicity in this matter concerning Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of or being with minor females, consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We trust that you will agree to a swift and amicable resolution of this issue. Otherwise, we will seek judicial intervention and ask Judge Crow to

ir trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of

sexual abuse of or being with minor females; or, (2) is injurious to Mr. Bradley Edwards' reputation, consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We trust that you will agree to a swift and amicable resolution of this issue. Otherwise, we will seek judicial intervention and ask Judge Crow to

communications by you and Mr. Edwards, as attorneys, with the media are also limited by the requirements of Rule 4-3.6 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Rule 4-3.6., entitled "Trial Publicity," states: (a) Prejudicial Extrajudicial Statements Prohibited. A lawyer shall not make an extrajudicial sta

ir trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of

fendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests this Court, pursuant to the foregoing authorities and consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, to issue a Protective Order barring Mr. Jack Scarola, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Mr. Bradley J. Edwards, and their respective agents and employees

power to control professional conduct. State ex rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910. Thereafter, the Supreme Court in McCrary stated: "Prohibition on comment is an acceptable alternative to prior restraint." Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d at 35-36 (