Epstein Secrets

en, Atty., N. L. R. B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Leo N. McGuire, Atty., N. L. R. B., Wash- ington, D. C., for petitioner. D. Bailey Merrill, William E. Statham, Evansville, Ind., for respondent C. L. Frank, Inc., Merrill, Schroeder & John- son, McCray

ted States District Court for the District of Columbia. Arthur Duncan McKey, Hanson & Molloy, Adam Augustine Caner, Law Office of Adam A. Carter, Washington, DC, for Appellant. Neil Matthew Corwin, U.S. Attorney's Office, New York, NY, for Appellees. Before: and ROGERS, Circuit Judges, SIIIMnior Circuit

U. S. Attys., Chicago, Ill., William W. Goodrich, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Joanne S. Sisk. Atty., Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D. C., for ap- pellees. Before CASTLE, KILEY, and SWY- GERT, Circuit Judges. CASTLE. Circuit Judge. The plaintiff-appellant, Dr. Andrew C. Ivy, brought

y are more ap- propriately ft to state factfinders and be- cause the involve hypothetical circum- stances.. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED. LYNNE, District Judge, dissenting: In my opinion the discussion and affirm- ance of the district court's denial of an injunction are inappropriat

haser of corporate bonds brought securities fraud action against broker deal- en, issuer's auditor and others. The United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, Albert G. Schatz, J., entered summary judgment dismissing the com- plaint, and purchaser appealed. The Court of Appeals, Ross, Circuit Jud

. We hold only that a sentence of probation, without a single day in jail or any period of supervised release is an unreasonable one. VACATED and REMANDED. C.A.11,2008. U.S. I. Pugh F.3d --, 2008 WL 253040 (C.A.11 (Ala.)) 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. EFTA00192140 Page I

n-breaching party is not entitled to rescission. *833 Michael R. Dreeben, Jonathan Goldman Ce- darbaurn, Jessie Acker Allen, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, Paula Camille Offenhauser, Asst. U.S. Any., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Lawrence Irwin Zinn, San Antonio, TX, for De- fendant-Appellant.

nt. We express no opinion as to the ad- missibility of any statements made by Wood either before or after the breach of the contract. REVERSED and REMANDED. C.A.I I (Fla.),1986. U.S. v. Wood 780 F.2d 929 O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Page 4 haps://web2.westlaw.com/pr