Epstein Secrets

d of a payment by the house manager to JD#5.) JD#5 received a $200 "Christmas present" via Western Union on December 23, 2004. Epstein offered her David Copperfield tickets and she spoke with Copperfield on the telephone. a l Around the third or fourth visit, Epstein began asking JD#5 about plans for her 18th bi

) JD#5 received a $200 "Christmas present" via Western Union on December 23, 2004. Epstein offered her David Copperfield tickets and she spoke with Copperfield on the telephone. a l Around the third or fourth visit, Epstein began asking JD#5 about plans for her 18th birthday, and he said to her, "So you're

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical worth used in different parts of the same act are in

her sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are int

rd of a payment by the house manager to JD#5.) JD#5 received a $200 "Christmas present" via Western Union on December 23, 2004. Epstein offered her David Copperfield tickets and she spoke with Copperfield on the telephone.33 Around the third or fourth visit, Epstein began asking JD#5 about plans for her 18th bir

) JD#5 received a $200 "Christmas present" via Western Union on December 23, 2004. Epstein offered her David Copperfield tickets and she spoke with Copperfield on the telephone.33 Around the third or fourth visit, Epstein began asking JD#5 about plans for her 18th birthday, and he said to her, "So you're r

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

JD#14 received a $200 "Christmas present" via Western Union on December 23, 2004. Epstein offered her David Copperfield tickets and she spoke with Copperfield on the telephone. M Around the third or fourth visit, Epstein began asking JD#14 about plans for her 18th birthday, and he said to her, "So you're

her 18th birthday. Jane Doe #10 states that she originally told Epstein that she was 18 but he found out that she wasn't and gave her 4 tickets to a David Copperfield show for her 18th birthday. Jane Doe #10 reports that, in the spring of 2004, she was working at a store at the Wellington Mall with Jane Doe #9. J

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

of a payment by the house manager to JD#13.) JD#13 received a $200 "Christmas present" via Western Union on December 23, 2004. Epstein offered her David Copperfield tickets and she spoke with Copperfield on the telephone. M Around the third or fourth visit, Epstein began asking JD#13 about plans for her 18th bir

JD#13 received a $200 "Christmas present" via Western Union on December 23, 2004. Epstein offered her David Copperfield tickets and she spoke with Copperfield on the telephone. M Around the third or fourth visit, Epstein began asking JD#13 about plans for her 18th birthday, and he said to her, "So you're