Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00799402

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ump, Dershowitz, former president Clinton, David Copperfield, and Leslie Wexner as an inducement to get Mr. Ep

Did you ever discuss with Mr. Rothstein or anyone on his behalf the value of taking the depositions of Trump, Dershowitz, former president Clinton, David Copperfield, and Leslie Wexner as an inducement to get Mr. Epstein to settle his lawsuits? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, page 284; line 18-23.

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

EFTA00582821

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

tempt to imperil my friendships. But, yes, I have socialized with Mr. Mottola. Id. at 91; lines 11-19. Q. Have you had a social relationship with David Copperfield? A. As a reaction to, once again, the abusive discovery process of bringing in names of people that have absolutely nothing to do with any of Mr. E

he names of friends of mine strictly in an attempt to stress my relationships, imperil my business relationships, going to say, yes, I do know Mr. Copperfield. Q. Have you ever socialized with David Copperfield? A. Again, as -- MR. PIKE: Form. THE WITNESS: Sony. It's a typical Edwards/Rothstein strategy

king of Epstein's affidavit is warranted. Edwards does not contend that Epstein failed to comply with a court order as contemplated by Rule 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; nor does Edwards assert that Epstein's affidavit contains material that should be stricken from a pleading as delineated in Rule 1.140 o

EFTA00585394

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ump, Dershowitz, former president Clinton, David Copperfield, and Leslie Wexner as an inducement to get Mr. Ep