Epstein Secrets

07 1 2 3 4 5 6 Page 309 Q. And was there more than one during the time you were there? A. Yes. Q. Do you remember their names? A. One was David, I don't remember the other one name. 7 Q. Did they appear to be American? 8 A. Yes, ma'am. 9 Q. Do you know the name 10 A. Could be, ma'am,

Form. 20 THE WITNESS: Yes, ma'am. 21 BY MS. EZELL: 22 Q. Do you know who that naked girl was? 23 A. I don't remember, ma'am. 24 Q. I believe David Copperfield's name came 25 up in the last deposition as someone who would 14 (Pages 319 to 322) Kress Court Reporting, Inc. 7115 Rue Notre Dame, Miami Beach,

ITNESS: No, they were not there. 20 BY MS. EZELL: 21 Q. Did any of them ever stay for dinner? 22 Just any dinner, not the dinner with David 23 Copperfield. 24 A. You said they, the girls? 25 Q. The girls who came to give massages. Page 325 1 we are start with it and then you can use 2 the initi

5 A. No, sir. 16 MR. WILLITS: I don't have any other 17 questions. 18 CROSS EXAMINATION 19 BY MR. CRITTON: 20 Q. Mr. Rodriguez, my name is Bob Critton and 21 1 represent Mr. Epstein as you're aware, I have a 22 few questions for you. 23 What I would like to remind you at the 24 start of this i

or faxes. But I have no idea of the 9 Q. David Copperfield. the magician? 10 relationship with other busin

nk I can remember 8 all of the business. except for the office. transfer of 8 anymore. 9 communications or faxes. But I have no idea of the 9 Q. David Copperfield. the magician? 10 relationship with other business partners. 10 A. No. I never saw him. 11 Q. Did you ever have to deal with his -- the 11 Q.

lm Beach. And I got to know 2 Orseck, on behalf of Jane Does 101 and 102. 2 Jeffrey through Lesley Wexner. And I used to work in 3 MR. CRITTON: Bob Critton. on behalf of 3 about 20 different. 20.25 different homes in Palm Beach 4 Jeffrey Epstein. 4 as a maintenance guy. 5 THEREUPON, 5 Q. Okay.

Form. 20 THE WITNESS: Yes, ma'am. 21 BY MS. EZELL: 22 Q. Do you know who that naked girl was? 23 A. I don't remember, ma'am. 24 Q. I believe David Copperfield's name came 25 up in the last deposition as someone who would 14 (Pages 319 to 322) Kress Court Renortino, Inc EFTA00310291 Page 323 1 call or v

ITNESS: No, they were not there. 20 BY MS. EZELL: 21 Q. Did any of them ever stay for dinner? 22 Just any dinner, not the dinner with David 23 Copperfield. 24 A. You said they, the girls? 25 Q. The girls who came to give massages. Page 325 1 we are start with It and then you can use 2 the initi

15 A. No, sir. 16 MR. WILLITS: I don't have any other 17 questions. 18 CROSS EXAMINATION 19 BY MR. CRITTON: 20 Q. Mr. Rodriguez, my name is Bob Critton and 21 I represent Mr. Epstein as you're aware, I have a 22 few questions for you. 23 What I would like to remind you at the 24 start of this is

d to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02001-02003 10/09/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley J. Edwards David Copperfield Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

ed to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 20217.20218 08/04/2009 Bradley Edwards Mike Fisten Info on Copperfield Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

issible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045-02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

d to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02001-02003 10/09/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley J. Edwards David Copperfield Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

ed to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 20217-20218 08/04/2009 Bradley Edwards Mike Fisten Info on Copperfield Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

ble evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045.02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

nior. Mr. Frederick Fekkai. Q. Who is that? A. Fekkai, Frederick Fckkai, the famous hairstylist. Who else? I don't think I can remember anymore. Q. David Copperfield, the magician? A. No, I never saw him. Q. You never saw him. Now, would these -- the people that you named were all people that you saw visiting

d to the investigation would be compensated and 17 Q. Have you ever gone to one of David 17 those who would not or who would hurt him in the 18 Copperfield's shows? 18 investigation would be dealt with? 19 MR. REINHART: Objection to form, lack of 19 MR. REINHART: Objection to the form, lack of 20

oe. 21 MR. LIINO: Adam Langino on behalf of 22 plaintiff, ■ 23 MS. EZELL: Cathy Ezell on behalf of Jane 24 Doe 101 and 102. 25 MR. CRITTON: Bob Critton on behalf of Page 13 1 Q. When was that? 2 A. I began on September of 2004. 3 Q. And where were you employed? 4 A. I work -- well, I have se

(former President of Sony Record); and J) David Copperfield (illusionist). 39. The above-named individuals w

PSTEIN'S criminal defense attorneys); Clinton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and J) David Copperfield (illusionist). 39. The above-named individuals were friends and acquaintances of EPSTEIN with whom he knew through business or philanthropic work o

g the amount of fees and costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review M

don't talk about business. He doesn't tell me about his business and I don't ask. Q. Are you aware that your brother is friendly or friends with David Copperfield? A. No. The magician? Q. Right. A. I have no idea, no. Q. Do you know any common interest that he shares with David Copperfield? A. Magic? I h

t your brother is friendly or friends with David Copperfield? A. No. The magician? Q. Right. A. I have no i

, that's fine. MR. COHEN: All right. Thank you. MR. EDWARDS And Sid Garcia is not in and he is not supposed to be in; right? MR. CRITTON: This is Bob Critton. I assume -- I don't know whether he was going to come or not, but I assume that everyone will also abide and not give Mr. Garcia a copy of the v

le witness from Switzerland Joint W/P Priv. 11332-11336 08/04/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards FW:Transcript of Alfrefo Rodriguez Depo and Copperfeild and Clinton's whereabouts Joint W/P Priv. 11340-11341 08/05/2009 Mercedes Estrada Bradley Edwards RE:Epstein vs.Jane Doe No.101 & 102 Joint

edes C. Estrada Doe v. Epstein Joint-privilege 02044 09/04/2009 Katherine W. Ezell Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Joint-privilege 02048 09/04/2009 Robert C. Josefsberg Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Joint-privilege 0

nt and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 20217.20218 08/04/2009 Info on Copperfield Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights from Bob Critton 02049-02053 09/04/2009 Doe v. Epstein — Letter Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to t