Epstein Secrets

2 Highbridge objects to the definition of "Glenn Dubin" as vague, overbroad, and unduly burdensome, par

ce the information requested in Instruction 2. SPECIFIC RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS Request No.1: All documents concerning any communication between Glenn Dubin on the one hand, and any of the Zwirn Parties on the other, concerning any of the Third-Party Claimants. Highbridge objects to the definition of "

thout limiting the foregoing, Highbridge shall not produce any documents exchanged by the parties in connection with the matter entitled Zwirn v. Corbin Capital Partners, L.P. et al., Index No. 08/603382. Objections to Definitions 1. Highbridge objects to the Definitions to the extent that they purport to impose

LLC, D.B. ZWIRN & CO, L.P., DBZ GP, LLC, ZWIRN HOLDINGS, LLC, and DANIEL ZWIRN, Third-Party Respondents. RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS OF NON-PARTY GLENN DUBIN TO THE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED NOVEMBER 9,2010 Non-party Glenn Dubin ("Dubin") hereby objects and Third-Party Respondents' subpoena dated Novem

rd-Party Respondents. RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS OF NON-PARTY GLENN DUBIN TO THE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED NOVEMBER 9,2010 Non-party Glenn Dubin ("Dubin") hereby objects and Third-Party Respondents' subpoena dated November 9 Dubin makes this response without in any way waiving any all potential o

on. Without limiting the foregoing, Dubin shall not produce any documents exchanged by the parties in connection with the matter entitled Zwirn v. Corbin Capital Partners, L.P. et al., Index No. 08/603382. Objections to Definitions 1 Dubin objects to the Definitions to the extent that they purport to impose obligat

n Capital Partners, a company controlled by Msrs Dubin and Swieca and in which you had a small interest

t there was a single capital account, not traunches? 4) And you invested in a fund called Pinehurst Plus LP which was established and managed by Corbin Capital Partners, a company controlled by Msrs Dubin and Swieca and in which you had a small interest? 5) And as X- indicates, any investment you made in Pinehur

interpreted as implying that Dubin acknowledges the propriety of that request. Dubin submits these General Responses and Objections without conceding the competency, relevancy, mater

tion. Without limiting the foregoing, Dubin shall not produce any documents exchanged by the parties in connection with the matter entitled Zwim v. Corbin Capital Partners, L.P. et al., Index No. 08/603382. Objections to Definitions 1. Dubin objects to the Definitions to the extent that they purport to impose obliga