Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

hland Series a-Cs indiL threshold Call irg • Call aro BetweenSeries r-Cs indif. threshold and exercise of common warrants (high) Call ail -Call so Betweenexerciseofcommon warrants (high) and exercise of common options Call •7 Chit s Between exercise of common options ilow)and exercise of common warrantsIC:ell en - Cal

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

hland Series a-Cs indiL threshold Call irg • Call aro BetweenSeries r-Cs indif. threshold and exercise of common warrants (high) Call ail -Call so Betweenexerciseofcommon warrants (high) and exercise of common options Call •7 Chit s Between exercise of common options ilow)and exercise of common warrantsIC:ell en - Cal

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

hland Series a-Cs indiL threshold Call irg • Call aro BetweenSeries r-Cs indif. threshold and exercise of common warrants (high) Call ail -Call so Betweenexerciseofcommon warrants (high) and exercise of common options Call •7 Chit s Between exercise of common options ilow)and exercise of common warrantsIC:ell en - Cal