Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

.6% 30.4% 15.0% 20.3% 15.2% 2009 43% 15.1% 5.8% 16.4% 283% 13.8% 18.7% 7.4% 2010 -63% 13.2% 0.7% 60.3% 21.1% 12.7% 20.9% 11.6% Noties; We excluded companim with CAGR indkations that were negative. We excluded companica with negative KIRT indications. this is not indieative of fat

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

.6% 30.4% 15.0% 20.3% 15.2% 2009 43% 15.1% 5.8% 16.4% 283% 13.8% 18.7% 7.4% 2010 -63% 13.2% 0.7% 60.3% 21.1% 12.7% 20.9% 11.6% Noties; We excluded companim with CAGR indkations that were negative. We excluded companica with negative KIRT indications. this is not indieative of fat

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

.6% 30.4% 15.0% 20.3% 15.2% 2009 43% 15.1% 5.8% 16.4% 283% 13.8% 18.7% 7.4% 2010 -63% 13.2% 0.7% 60.3% 21.1% 12.7% 20.9% 11.6% Noties; We excluded companim with CAGR indkations that were negative. We excluded companica with negative KIRT indications. this is not indieative of fat