Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

did not necessarily mean that marketability discounts were generally lower; riskier companies generally could not complete an IPO in 2001. ie From Brian V- Pearson, 'The zoo! Marketability Discount Study," CPA Expert, Spring 2002; Pearson, t2000 Marketability Discounts as Reflected in Initial Public Of Busines

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

did not necessarily mean that marketability discounts were generally lower; riskier companies generally could not complete an IPO in 2001. ie From Brian V- Pearson, 'The zoo! Marketability Discount Study," CPA Expert, Spring 2002; Pearson, t2000 Marketability Discounts as Reflected in Initial Public Of Busines

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

did not necessarily mean that marketability discounts were generally lower; riskier companies generally could not complete an IPO in 2001. ie From Brian V- Pearson, 'The zoo! Marketability Discount Study," CPA Expert, Spring 2002; Pearson, t2000 Marketability Discounts as Reflected in Initial Public Of Busines