Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

k from 1980 through 2000. The Emory studies compared the prices of stock transactions occurring within flue months prior to an IPO to the subsequent LEO price. Emory noted that the discounts found in these studies occur where a high degree of marketability is probable but not certain, and observed that th

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

k from 1980 through 2000. The Emory studies compared the prices of stock transactions occurring within flue months prior to an IPO to the subsequent LEO price. Emory noted that the discounts found in these studies occur where a high degree of marketability is probable but not certain, and observed that th

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

k from 1980 through 2000. The Emory studies compared the prices of stock transactions occurring within flue months prior to an IPO to the subsequent LEO price. Emory noted that the discounts found in these studies occur where a high degree of marketability is probable but not certain, and observed that th