Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

inancial Analysis ALIPHCOM - COMMON EQUITY VALUATION As of June 20, 2011 10 EFTA00307405 WTAS ALIPHCOM — COMMON EQUITY VALUATION REPORT As of JUlle 20, 2011 Exhibit B: Historical Financial Analysis Aliph's revenues rebounded in 2010 following the decline in 2009 as a result of the lackluster de

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

inancial Analysis ALIPHCOM - COMMON EQUITY VALUATION As of June 20, 2011 10 EFTA00307304 WTAS ALIPHCOM — COMMON EQUITY VALUATION REPORT As of JUlle 20, 2011 Exhibit B: Historical Financial Analysis Aliph's revenues rebounded in 2010 following the decline in 2009 as a result of the lackluster de

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

inancial Analysis ALIPHCOM - COMMON EQUITY VALUATION As of June 20, 2011 10 EFTA00307203 WTAS ALIPHCOM — COMMON EQUITY VALUATION REPORT As of JUlle 20, 2011 Exhibit B: Historical Financial Analysis Aliph's revenues rebounded in 2010 following the decline in 2009 as a result of the lackluster de