Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

companies). The study concluded that companies with stocks listed on national exchanges had lower discounts than companies with stocks traded OTC. • Gelman Study's. The Gelman Study reviewed the prices paid by four closed-end investment companies specializing in restricted securities from 1968 to 1970. This stu

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

companies). The study concluded that companies with stocks listed on national exchanges had lower discounts than companies with stocks traded OTC. • Gelman Study's. The Gelman Study reviewed the prices paid by four closed-end investment companies specializing in restricted securities from 1968 to 1970. This stu

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

companies). The study concluded that companies with stocks listed on national exchanges had lower discounts than companies with stocks traded OTC. • Gelman Study's. The Gelman Study reviewed the prices paid by four closed-end investment companies specializing in restricted securities from 1968 to 1970. This stu